1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 578 So.2d
  5. 578 So.2d 1221 (1991)
 

ESPEY v. CONVENIENCE MARKETERS

89-859.

578 So.2d 1221 (1991)

James A. ESPEY, a minor, who sues By and Through his father and next friend and Guardian, James Q. ESPEY; and James Q. Espey v. CONVENIENCE MARKETERS, INC.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied April 5, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph G. Pierce and Jack Drake of Drake, Knowles & Pierce, Tuscaloosa, for appellants.

J. Russell Gibson III and Michael S. Burroughs of Phelps, Owens, Jenkins, Gibson & Fowler, Tuscaloosa, for appellee.

KENNEDY, Justice.

James A. Espey, suing through his father and guardian, James Q. Espey; and James Q. Espey, individually, filed an action against Convenience Marketers, Inc. ("Convenience"), alleging, among other claims, that they were entitled to damages from Convenience pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, §§ 6-5-70 and -71. James A. Espey was a minor at the time of the events that led to this case and is an incompetent. The father asserts a claim pursuant to ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases