ARLEDGE v. STRATMAR SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 1542, Docket 91-7141.

948 F.2d 845 (1991)

Jerry M. ARLEDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRATMAR SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided November 1, 1991.

As Corrected November 12, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Laviano, Ridgefield, Conn., for plaintiff-appellant.

James F. Donohue, White Plains, N.Y. (Donohue & Locker, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before KEARSE, MAHONEY, and SNEED, Circuit Judges.


MAHONEY, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Jerry M. Arledge appeals from a summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Vincent L. Broderick, Judge, entered January 9, 1991 in favor of defendant-appellee Stratmar Systems, Inc. ("Stratmar").

Applying New York law in this diversity case, we rule that Arledge's contract with Stratmar was terminable at will, and accordingly affirm.

Background

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases