1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 818 P.2d
  5. 818 P.2d 959 (1991)
 

GREUNER v. LANE COUNTY

LUBA 91-022; CA A70627.

818 P.2d 959 (1991)

109 Or.App. 160

Robert W. GREUNER, Respondent, v. LANE COUNTY, Respondent below, and James Peterson, Jr., Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 9, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James N. Welty, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Luvaas, Cobb, Richards & Fraser, P.C., Eugene.

Douglas N. DuPriest, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hutchinson, Anderson, Cox, Parrish & Coons, P.C., Eugene.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and De MUNIZ, JJ.

BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's reversal of Lane County's special use permit that would have allowed petitioner to operate a facility in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone to train dogs to be "companions and protectors, such as those needed by joggers." LUBA concluded that the proposed facility was not permissible under either section 16.212(4)(1) of the county code or ORS 215.213(2)(L). We agree with LUBA that the facility does not qualify...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases