ROSEMAN v. STATE

No. 91-1759.

585 So.2d 1184 (1991)

Andrew James ROSEMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

September 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew James Roseman, Raiford, pro se.

No Appearance for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is in prison for armed robbery, burglary, grand theft and grand theft auto and has filed a motion for leave to apply for Writ of Error Coram Nobis, alleging that he has discovered new evidence regarding his conviction. His claim of newly discovered evidence must be raised in the trial court under a Rule 3.850 motion. See Richardson v. State, 546 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 1989). The motion for leave to proceed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases