1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 579 N.E.2d
  5. 579 N.E.2d 1188 (1991)
 

ARMOUR v. PETERSEN

No. 4-91-0299.

579 N.E.2d 1188 (1991)

219 Ill. App.3d 289

162 Ill.Dec. 374

Betty Jo ARMOUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Walter PETERSEN, Respondent in Discovery-Appellee.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District.

September 30, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert I. Auler, Auler Law Offices, P.C., Urbana, for plaintiff-appellant.

David A. Bailie, Thomas, Mamer & Haughey, Champaign, for respondent in discovery-appellee.

Justice KNECHT delivered the opinion of the court:

On August 6, 1990, Armour filed a complaint in discovery against respondent in discovery, Dr. Walter Petersen. Armour sought discovery against Dr. Petersen to determine whether he should be named as a defendant "in the above-captioned cause of action." On January 31, 1991, Armour filed a motion to add respondent in discovery, Dr. Petersen, as a defendant. Armour attached a complaint, naming Dr. Petersen as the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases