1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 756 F.Supp.
  5. 756 F.Supp. 1004 (1991)
 

RHEAMS v. BANKSTON, WRIGHT & GREENHILL

Civ. A. No. SA-88-CA-971.

756 F.Supp. 1004 (1991)

Felix Charles RHEAMS, Plaintiff, v. BANKSTON, WRIGHT & GREENHILL, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division.

February 21, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earle E. Cobb, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff.

George H. Spencer, Jr., Clemens & Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., David W. Dixon, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Legal Dept., Dallas, Tex., and James M. Hill, Jr., Small, Craig & Werkenthin, San Antonio, Tex., for defendants.

ORDER

PRADO, District Judge.

On this date the Court considered the Motion to Reconsider, filed on February 5, 1991, by Timothy Heup, Scott Gesell, Glenn Seeley, Jim Smith, and Robert Torres (the "Defendants").1 In this Motion Defendants request that the Court vacate its Order of January 31, 1991 (the "Order"), in which the Court determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction in this case and remanded the case to state...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases