1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 585 So.2d
  5. 585 So.2d 1172 (1991)
 

PINCUS v. CARLISLE

No. 91-1885.

585 So.2d 1172 (1991)

Stanley PINCUS, Petitioner, v. The Honorable James T. CARLISLE, and the Honorable John D. Wessel, Judges of the Fifteenth Circuit of the State of Florida, Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 18, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Stetson, West Palm Beach, and Laurence A. Greenberg of Lerner and Greenberg, P.A., Hollywood, for petitioner.

Herbert H. Rolnick of Horowitz & Rolnick, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Since the fundamental nature of the plaintiffs' claim against petitioner Stanley Pincus in Count I of the complaint involves rights equivalent to those protected by federal patent and copyright law, we conclude that Count I, as against Pincus, is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal district courts. See 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a); Garrido v. Burger King Corp., 558 So.2d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990);...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases