MADANI v. KENDALL FORD, INC.

CC 16-87-02515; CA A49072; SC S37390, SC S37408.

818 P.2d 930 (1991)

312 Or. 198

Hamid MADANI, Petitioner/Respondent On Review, v. KENDALL FORD, INC., an Oregon Corporation, and Dan David, Respondents/Petitioners On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided October 10, 1991.

Reconsideration Denied November 26, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Franz, Jr., Eugene, argued the cause and filed the petition, for petitioner/respondent on review.

Jeffrey E. Potter, Lombard, Gardner, Honsowetz, Brewer & Schons, Eugene, argued the cause, for respondents/petitioners on review. With him on the petition, was Jack A. Gardner, Eugene.


GRABER, Judge.

This case concerns the sufficiency of the pleading of two tort claims: wrongful discharge and intentional infliction of severe emotional distress. We hold that plaintiff's amended complaint is not sufficient to plead either tort.

Plaintiff's amended complaint alleges that defendant Kendall Ford, Inc., employed him as a salesperson and that defendant Dan David was his supervisor. In his claim for wrongful discharge, plaintiff further alleges...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases