1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 226 Cal.App.3d
  5. 226 Cal.App.3d 1493 (1991)
 

BECKER v. McMILLIN CONSTRUCTION CO.

Docket No. D010109.

226 Cal.App.3d 1493 (1991)

277 Cal. Rptr. 491

ARTHUR BECKER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. McMILLIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

January 22, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Edwards, White & Sooy, Charles R. Bongard and John A. Simpson for Defendant and Appellant.

Duke, Gerstel, Shearer & Bregante, Stephen V. Rupp and Dawn R. Brennan for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

HUFFMAN, J.

McMillin Construction Company, Inc., (McMillin) appeals the judgment entered on a general verdict in favor of Arthur and Mary Becker (Becker) after the trial court denied McMillin's motion for separate trial on a statute of limitations defense (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 597, 337.15).1 The trial judge found the applicable limitations period, 10 years, had been tolled by the pendency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases