JACOBS v. FRANK

No. 90-320.

60 Ohio St. 3d 111 (1991)

JACOBS, APPELLEE, v. FRANK, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 5, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Gary and Jori Bloom Naegele, for appellee.

Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Jay Clinton Rice and Kevin C. Alexandersen, for appellant.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, John Winship Read, Timm H. Judson, Anthony J. O'Malley and Timothy G. Clancy, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Virginia State Board of Medicine.


MOYER, C.J.

Our disposition of this case begins with a determination as to whether Frank has a qualified privilege pursuant to R.C. 2305.25 that protects the statements he wrote in his October 25 letter.1 If the statements in Frank's letter are cloaked with a qualified privilege, Jacobs must prove Frank acted with "actual malice" to defeat the protection afforded by the statute.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases