SPAR v. PACIFIC BELL

Docket No. B045617.

235 Cal.App.3d 1480 (1991)

1 Cal. Rptr.2d 480

ROBERT SPAR et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PACIFIC BELL, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

November 14, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Lascher & Lascher and Edward L. Lascher for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Margaret deB. Brown, Sarah J. Diehl, R. Bart Kimball, John Keiser and Elta M. Wilson for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

WOODS (Fred), J.

Canord Investment Company1 appeals from the trial court's judgment which held, because respondent Pacific Bell's telephone facilities were a permanent nuisance, plaintiff's cause of action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations for a permanent nuisance/trespass. Plaintiff contends the nuisance was instead continuing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases