1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 228 Cal.App.3d
  5. 228 Cal.App.3d 1487 (1991)
 

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket Nos. E007431, E007432, E007433.

228 Cal.App.3d 1487 (1991)

279 Cal. Rptr. 558

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Respondent; STEPHEN A. BIRBECK et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

April 1, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Gerald J. Geerlings and William C. Katzenstein, County Counsel, Lee A. Vinocour, Deputy County Counsel, Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth, Paul L. Gale and Gary A. Pemberton for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, R. Bruce Tepper, Jr., Marc J. Manason and Jean L. Harris for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

HOLLENHORST, J.

We issued an alternative writ of mandate in these three consolidated proceedings to address a single issue: Does the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq. — hereinafter cited as the CRL and/or by statutory section number only) contain an administrative review procedure which must be pursued and exhausted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases