STATE v. CROMWELL

10-89-00870; CA A64510.

820 P.2d 888 (1991)

109 Or.App. 654

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Michael Eric CROMWELL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 13, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Ford, Springfield, waived oral argument for appellant. With him on the brief was Naslund, Budge & Ford, Springfield.

Michael C. Livingston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


DE MUNIZ, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He asserts that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a warrantless search of the passenger compartment of his pickup truck. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. On January 19, 1989, Oregon State Police Officers Collins and Houlihan responded to a report of a prowler near a residence in Eugene. The resident...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases