STATE v. BROWN

C 89-308; CA A63253.

820 P.2d 878 (1991)

109 Or.App. 636

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. David Russell BROWN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 13, 1991.

Reconsideration Denied January 15, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald H. Hoevet, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Hoevet, Snyder & Miller, P.C., Portland.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


DE MUNIZ, Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions for manufacturing a controlled substance and on two counts of possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred when it failed to make findings or conclusions in its denial of his motions to controvert and to suppress, denied his motion to suppress evidence found in the search of his residence, trailer and safe deposit box and convicted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases