1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 930 F.2d
  5. 930 F.2d 762 (1991)
 

C.H.I. INC. v. MARCUS BROS. TEXTILE, INC.

No. 90-55960.

930 F.2d 762 (1991)

C.H.I. INC., d.b.a. C.H. Sport, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCUS BROTHERS TEXTILE, INC., and does 1 through 15, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael C. Baum, Tucker & Baum, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Elizabeth F. Skoler, Proskauer Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before BOOCHEVER, KOZINSKI and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

C.H.I. appeals the district court's dismissal for failure to arbitrate its breach of contract claim against Marcus Brothers. C.H.I. argues that the arbitration clause in the Marcus Brothers' confirmation form is unenforceable because: 1) it is an adhesion contract; 2) C.H.I. did not knowingly consent to arbitration; 3) C.H.I. signed it under economic duress; and, 4) its terms lacked specificity. We AFFIRM.

BACKGROUND

During...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases