1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 949 F.2d
  5. 949 F.2d 736 (1991)
 

DOE v. DOE

Nos. 90-3226, 90-3536.

949 F.2d 736 (1991)

John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DOE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 13, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rhonda M. Benedetto, Lanny R. Zatzkis, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

Francis A. Olivier, III, John L. Olivier, Sunset, La., for Davis.

Malcolm W. Monroe, Joseph L. Spilman, III, Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, La., for Hill.

Before WISDOM, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We deny the petition for rehearing, except as follows. The Louisiana Press Association, as amicus curiae, has argued that the Louisiana common law definition of actual malice is narrower than the federal definition established in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964). It thus challenged that part of our opinion in which we defined actual malice as having knowledge that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases