HURST CONST. CO. v. RAMEY

No. 90CA680.

821 P.2d 858 (1991)

HURST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Petitioners, v. Bruce A. RAMEY, Darrell Slater d/b/a Custom Farm Service, the Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado, and the Colorado Division of Labor, Respondents.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Rehearing Denied June 20, 1991.

Certiorari Denied December 23, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glasman, Jaynes & McBride, Ronald C. Jaynes, Lydia W. Daugherty, Denver, for petitioners.

Sarney, Trattler & Waitkus, P.C., Terry D. Gordon, Denver, for respondents Bruce A. Ramey and Darrell Slater d/b/a Custom Farm Service.

Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Jeanne Labuda, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for respondents the Indus. Claim Appeals Office and the Colorado Div. of Labor.


Opinion by Judge RULAND.

Hurst Construction Company and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company seek review of the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel ruling that Hurst was not exempt from the Workers' Compensation Act under § 8-48-101(6), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 3B) (now § 8-41-401(6), C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.)). We affirm.

Hurst Construction Company entered into a contract to build roads. Because Hurst neither owned trucks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases