1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 575 So.2d
  5. 575 So.2d 1100 (1991)
 

MEEK v. DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS CORP.

89-1610, 1900113.

575 So.2d 1100 (1991)

Larry D. MEEK v. DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION. Ex parte Larry D. MEEK. (Re Larry D. MEEK v. DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION).

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 1, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ruth S. Sullivan, Dadeville, for appellant and petitioner.

Larry E. Forrester of Smith, Currie & Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., and W.F. Horsley of Samford, Denson, Horsley, Pettey, Martin and Barrett, Opelika, for appellee and respondent.

SHORES, Justice.

Larry D. Meek, plaintiff in a lawsuit, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, challenging an award of attorney fees to the defendant, Diversified Products Corporation, under the Alabama Litigation Accountability Act, §§ 12-19-270 through -276, Ala.Code 1975 (1987 Cum.Supp.). We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

Meek filed the complaint in this case, his second lawsuit against Diversified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases