LORD v. PETTIBON

83-6-27 and 85-11312; CA A42199.

810 P.2d 863 (1991)

107 Or.App. 18

Steven G. LORD, Respondent, and Daniel E. Beeson, Plaintiff, v. Burl R. PETTIBON, Appellant. Burl R. Pettibon, Appellant, v. Steven G. Lord, Respondent, and Daniel E. Beeson, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 1, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Patrick O'Malley and Delo & O'Malley, Portland, for petition.

Craig D. White, Portland, filed an objection for appellant.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


On Respondent's Petition for Attorney Fees August 23, 1990.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

After our opinion dismissing this appeal, 102 Or.App. 607, 795 P.2d 607 (1990), respondent Lord petitioned for attorney fees under ORS 20.105. He contends that the appeal was without merit and was pursued in bad faith. We deny the petition.

Our opinion recited some of the procedural history...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases