SNOKE v. BOLEN

Docket No. A051904.

235 Cal.App.3d 1427 (1991)

1 Cal. Rptr.2d 492

FRANCES SNOKE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WILLIAM BOLEN, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

November 14, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Carolyn L. Rosenblatt and Mary McLain for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, Arthur V. Pearson and Emilia L. Sweeney for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

HANING, J.

Plaintiff/appellant Frances Snoke appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendant/respondent William B. Bolen, D.D.S., in her dental malpractice action. She challenges the trial court's ruling that her action was barred by the statute of limitations. (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.5.)1

FACTS

In November 1986 respondent Bolen, appellant's dentist, referred her to Dr....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases