STATE v. BENTON

TC B63-787; CA A61763; SC S37184.

810 P.2d 851 (1991)

311 Or. 295

STATE of Oregon, Respondent On Review, v. Larry David BENTON, Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided May 2, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Hill, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and CARSON, GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY and UNIS, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of contempt for wilful failure to pay restitution and ordering him to serve three days in jail. ORS 161.685.1 The Court of Appeals concluded that the statute authorized only civil contempt and that the trial court's penalty was criminal because the court sentenced defendant to a determinate sentence of imprisonment with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases