STATE v. TUCKER

85-0025; CA A63477.

820 P.2d 834 (1991)

109 Or.App. 519

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Mindi Marie TUCKER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 13, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne Mackeson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Des Connall, P.C., Portland.

Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Rives Kistler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals her conviction for the murder of her husband. The state's theory of the case was that defendant and her accomplice, Craig Pottle, conspired to kill the victim and to share his life insurance proceeds. There have been two prior appeals in this case. In the first, we affirmed the trial court's pretrial order suppressing unlawfully obtained wiretap evidence, acquired by a police monitor of defendant's telephone during the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases