1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 793 F.Supp.
  5. 793 F.Supp. 852 (1991)
 

ALLSTATE INS. CO. v. SHOCKLEY

No. IP 90-1595-C.

793 F.Supp. 852 (1991)

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Norman C. SHOCKLEY, Edith Edna Shockley, DeWayne DesJarlais, Karen DesJarlais, Jennifer Kay DesJarlais, Joseph Keith DesJarlais, and Jacob Kyle DesJarlais, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

November 19, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Hammel, Yarling Robinson Hammel & Lamb, Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiff.

L. Craig Turner, Boberschmidt Miller O'Bryan & Turner, Indianapolis, Ind., for defendant Norman C. Shockley.

Michael T. Conway, Allen Baratz Conway & Hammerle, Indianapolis, Ind., for defendant Edith Edna Shockley.

Frederick W. Crow, Young & Young, Indianapolis, Ind., for defendants DeWayne DesJarlais and Karen DesJarlais.

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McKINNEY, District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court on the motion of plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate") for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All the defendants have responded to the motion, and Allstate has timely replied, so the issues are ready for resolution. For the reasons discussed below, the Court now GRANTS Allstate's motion.

I. FACTUAL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases