TOLEDO BAR ASSN. v. SPARROW

No. 90-2079.

60 Ohio St. 3d 102 (1991)

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. SPARROW.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 5, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank E. Kane, Dale W. Fallat and John N. MacKay, for relator.

John Czarnecki, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

We concur with the findings of the board; however, we modify the sanction. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., HOLMES and WRIGHT, JJ., dissent.

MOYER, C.J., dissenting.

I would order a six-month suspension, but would suspend same pending respondent's successful completion of a six...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases