STATE, EX REL. CINCINNATI POST v. COURT OF COM. PLEAS OF HAMILTON CTY.

No. 90-1923.

59 Ohio St. 3d 103 (1991)

THE STATE, EX REL. THE CINCINNATI POST, v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF HAMILTON COUNTY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 24, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baker & Hostetler, Bruce W. Sanford, David L. Marburger and Jonathan D. Henry, for relator.

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, Roger E. Friedmann and Scott C. Kirschman, for respondents.


Per Curiam.

In this action, the Post challenges the constitutionality of the trial judge's post-verdict order that "[n]o one is to talk to the jurors about the case, and the jurors aren't to talk to anybody about it." We conclude that, while a more narrowly focused order might have been constitutional, this one violates the First Amendment.

I

Federal courts have struck down similar post-verdict orders on First Amendment grounds. Such a case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases