1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 756 F.Supp.
  5. 756 F.Supp. 868 (1991)
 

DERBY & CO., INC. v. SEAVIEW PETROLEUM CO.

Civ. A. No. 82-2964.

756 F.Supp. 868 (1991)

DERBY & CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. SEAVIEW PETROLEUM COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

February 19, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Lynch, New York City, Thomas P. Preston, Philadelphia, Pa., Jerome E. Sharfman, Newark, N.J., for plaintiff.

William A. Jacobson, Charles R. Jacob, III, New York City, John P. Mason, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DITTER, District Judge.

Defendant Seaview Petroleum Company moves for summary judgment on the ground that there is no evidence to support plaintiff's claims for negligence, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. In the alternative, in a supplemental motion for summary judgment, Seaview avers that Derby's complaint is barred by New Jersey's Entire Controversy Doctrine. There is no merit in either motion and both will be denied.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases