URBAN REDEV. AUTH. v. UNEMP. COMP.


142 Pa.Commw. 20 (1991)

596 A.2d 1209

URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PITTSBURGH, a Redevelopment Authority, Petitioner, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided August 14, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Berkley, Sp. Counsel, for petitioner.

Maribeth Wilt-Seibert, Asst. Counsel, for respondent.

Before SMITH and PELLEGRINI, JJ., and SILVESTRI, Senior Judge.


SILVESTRI, Senior Judge.

Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (URA) petitions for review of the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), dated August 31, 1990, which reversed the referee's decision and determined that Thomas H. Smith (claimant) is financially eligible for benefits. We affirm.

Upon filing a claim for benefits pursuant to the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law)1 with the Office of Employment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases