BUEHL v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS


160 Pa.Commw. 1 (1991)

635 A.2d 217

Roger Peter BUEHL, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Joseph Lehman, Acting Commissioner; Theodore Otto, III, Chief Counsel, Respondents. Roger Peter BUEHL, Petitioner, v. Joseph LEHMAN, Acting Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Donald Vaughn, Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided September 20, 1991.

Publication Ordered December 9, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Buehl, pro se.

Theodore H. Otto, III, David B. Farney and Frank Micale, for respondents.

Before DOYLE and BYER, JJ., and BARRY, Senior Judge.


BYER, Judge.

The respondents (collectively, department) have filed preliminary objections to Roger Buehl's consolidated petitions for review. The petitions are addressed both to our original and appellate jurisdiction. We sustain the preliminary objections.

Buehl, an inmate, wrote to the Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution of Graterford stating two grievances. These grievances concerned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases