WOODFORD v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.

Nos. 89-445-CIV-5-BR, 90-27-CIV-5-BR,

779 F.Supp. 827 (1991)

Donald L. WOODFORD and Diane O. Woodford, Plaintiffs, v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Defendant. Michael A. HUFFMAN and Bertha E. Huffman, Plaintiffs, v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY and Donald L. Woodford, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division.

November 7, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Anthony Penry, Petree, Stockton & Robinson, Raleigh, N.C., William G. Alexander, Alexander and Brown, Concord, N.C., for plaintiffs Michael A. Huffman and Bertha E. Huffman.

Kirk Gibson Warner, Yates, Fleishman, McLamb & Weyher, Kieran J. Shanahan, Patton, Boggs & Blow, Raleigh, N.C., for defendant Carolina Power & Light Co.

Nigle B. Barrow, Jr., James F. Hopf, Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, Raleigh, N.C., for defendant Donald L. Woodford.


ORDER

BRITT, District Judge.

This order memorializes the court's reasoning for its denial of all summary judgment motions in its 30 October 1991 order, and should serve to streamline the issues and outline the respective burdens of proof each party must meet in this litigation.

SUMMARY OF FACTS AND ARGUMENT

These are suits in admiralty which arise out of the same transaction and have been consolidated. In their motion, which is the subject...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases