1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 752 F.Supp.
  5. 752 F.Supp. 851 (1991)
 

U.S. v. VILLAREAL

No. 90 CR 857-2.

752 F.Supp. 851 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rodolfo Pena VILLAREAL, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

January 3, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Foreman, U.S. Atty. by Julia E. Getzels, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Robert E. Gordon, Gordon & Gordon, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

Defendant Villareal presents this court with a far-flung discovery motion. Indeed, the court suspects that defendant has forgotten what court he addresses as his motion makes reference to the "State" and the Illinois Supreme Court Rules. Defendant is in federal court. To the extent that his discovery requests embrace matters that should be disclosed pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases