1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 233 Cal.App.3d
  5. 233 Cal.App.3d 1365 (1991)
 

TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY v. KING

Docket No. C005345.

233 Cal.App.3d 1365 (1991)

285 Cal. Rptr. 335

TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BRUCE KING et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

September 6, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Crowell, Susich, Owen & Tackes and Gary A. Owen for Plaintiff and Appellant.

J. Dennis Crabb, City Attorney (South Lake Tahoe), as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Price, Postel & Parma, David K. Hughes and Peter M. Tiersma for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

DAVIS, J. —

I. INTRODUCTION

The central issues posed by this appeal are whether plaintiff Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) may compel the removal of defendants' off-premise billboard signs pursuant to its sign ordinance which allows a five-year preremoval amortization period to recoup costs or whether it is (1) statutorily compelled to pay compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases