HINSON v. McQUEEN

No. 91-1034.

581 So.2d 1007 (1991)

Edward James HINSON, Petitioner, v. James D. McQUEEN, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 16, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward James Hinson, in pro. per.

James D. McQueen, in pro. per.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Mandamus denied.

NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ., concur.

BASKIN, Judge (concurring).

I concur in the majority's denial without prejudice of the petition for writ of mandamus. The petitioner may seek appropriate relief in the circuit court. Snowden v. Davis, 581 So.2d 243 (Fla....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases