1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 58 Ohio
  5. 58 Ohio St. 3d 99 (1991)
 

STATE, EX REL. McKIM v. HOBART CORP.

No. 90-67.

58 Ohio St. 3d 99 (1991)

THE STATE, EX REL. McKIM, APPELLANT, v. HOBART CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 20, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant.

Thompson, Hine & Flory, Theodore E. Laszlo and Michelle La-Fond Potter, for appellee Hobart Corporation.

Lee I. Fisher, attorney general, and Peter E. DeMarco, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Per Curiam.

Appellant seeks a writ of mandamus from what is essentially an interlocutory discovery order. Mandamus, however, does not lie from such orders. State, ex rel. Sobczak, v. Show (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 13, 550 N.E.2d 455.

For the reason stated above, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases