U.S. v. FORD

No. 87-20193.

812 F.Supp. 761 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Harold E. FORD, Douglas R. Beaty, Karl A. Schledwitz and David A. Crabtree, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, W.D.

April 10, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Humbel, Chattanooga, TN, Dan Clancy, Jackson, TN, for U.S.

William McDaniels, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, J. Alan Hanover, Memphis, TN, for Congressman Harold Ford.

Kemper Durand, Memphis, TN, for Douglas Beaty.

Herbert Moncier, Ann Short, Knoxville, TN, for Karl Schledwitz.

Anthony Lomonaco, Knoxville, TN, for David Crabtree.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

HORTON, Chief Judge.

Defendants' individually, or by joinder, filed the following motions in this case for resolution by this Court:

Motion to dismiss the indictment because there was no manifest necessity for the declaration of a mistrial by the Court and, therefore, a retrial would violate the defendants' rights under the double jeopardy clause of the Constitution of the United States. Motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases