STATE v. THURMAN

No. CR 91-93.

808 S.W.2d 762 (1991)

305 Ark. 448

STATE of Arkansas, Appellant, v. Theresa and Doug THURMAN, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

May 13, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sandy Moll, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellant.

Gene McKissic, Pine Bluff, for appellees.


DUDLEY, Justice.

The jury found the appellees guilty of a misdemeanor. They moved for judgments notwithstanding the verdicts. The State objected and, among other things, contended that such judgments are not authorized by the Rules of Criminal Procedure. See A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36.22. The trial court granted the judgments notwithstanding the verdicts. The State attempts to appeal the decision for the future guidance of trial courts. See A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36.10. We dismiss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases