1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 938 F.2d
  5. 938 F.2d 627 (1991)
 

TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. N.L.R.B.

Nos. 90-6021, 90-6102.

938 F.2d 627 (1991)

TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, INC., d/b/a Teledyne Still-Man, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided June 11, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Alexander Blue, Jr., Larry W. Bridgesmith (argued), Constangy, Brooks & Smith, Nashville, Tenn., Alan L. Rolnick, Constangy, Brooks & Smith, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner cross-respondent.

Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick Havard (argued), Eric G. Moskowitz, N.L.R.B., Office of the General Counsel, Washington, D.C., Martin M. Arlook, Director, N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent cross-petitioner.

Before NELSON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.

LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is a petition by Teledyne for review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board finding that Teledyne violated Section 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) and (3). The Board has filed a cross-application for enforcement. The Decision and Order of the Board appear at 298 NLRB No. 148 (1990).

There is no dispute about the operative facts. On February...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases