1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 62 Wn.
  5. 62 Wn. App. 92 (1991)
 

ROBINSON v. HAMED

Nos. 26165-7-I; 26341-2-I.

62 Wn. App. 92 (1991)

813 P.2d 171

RONALD H. ROBINSON, ET AL, Respondents, v. DAVID M. HAMED, ET AL, Appellants, THE BOEING COMPANY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

July 29, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Glowney and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, for appellants.

Larry B. Hannah, Joan C. Clarke, and Perkins Coie, for respondents The Boeing Company, et al.

William W. Hague and Monroe, Stokes, Eitelbach & Lawrence, for respondents Robinson, et al.

FORREST, J.

Hamed appeals summary judgments dismissing his claims of defamation, tortious interference, aiding and abetting a tort, and ratification against Robinson, Jones and Boeing.1 Hamed also claims the court erred in denying certain discovery requests and refusing to hear his motion for reconsideration. The defendants cross-appeal claiming the court should have granted a motion for summary judgment based on collateral estoppel.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases