STATE v. MEYRICK

DCR88-13646; CA A61490.

809 P.2d 710 (1991)

106 Or.App. 682

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Anthony Wade MEYRICK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 17, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur P. Stangell, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Wendy Jo Paris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for criminal mischief in the second degree. ORS 164.354.1 He assigns as error that the court allowed him to represent himself without first ascertaining that his waiver of counsel was intelligent and competent. We reverse.

At defendant's arraignment, the court and defendant engaged in this colloquy:

"Court: Okay, Mr. Meyrick, the offense of menacing and criminal mischief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases