1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 829 S.W.2d
  5. 829 S.W.2d 679 (1991)
 

HASTINGS v. SO. CENT. HUMAN RES. AGENCY

829 S.W.2d 679 (1991)

Hart HASTINGS and Teri Laster, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. SOUTH CENTRAL HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY, Defendant/Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Nashville.

Application for Permission to Appeal Denied March 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Ray, Paul T. Housh, Ray & Housch, Nashville, for plaintiffs/appellees.

Clinton H. Swafford, Swafford, Peters & O'Neal, Winchester, for defendant/appellant.

Application for Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court, March 9, 1992.

FARMER, Judge.

This is an appeal from the trial court's finding that the South Central Resource Agency acted illegally, arbitrarily and capriciously, and the Chancellor's order for the agency to reinstate the plaintiffs to their former positions with back pay, seniority and other emoluments of the office.

South Central Human Resource Agency ("SCHRA") is located in Lincoln...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases