KAMASINSKI v. RUBIN

Civ. No. B-90-408 (WWE).

764 F.Supp. 741 (1991)

Theodore KAMASINSKI, Plaintiff, v. Harvey RUBIN, Carol Rubin and Hon. Edward F. Stodolink, individually and in his official capacity as a Judge of the Connecticut Superior Court, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

April 5, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis I. Parley, The Marcus Law Firm, New Haven, Conn., for plaintiff.

Theodore Kamasinski, pro se.

Henry S. Cohn, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn., Jonathan Katz, William M. Bloss, Jacobs, Grudberg, Belt & Dow, P.C., New Haven, Conn., for defendants.


RULING ON DEFENDANT HARVEY RUBIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS

EGINTON, District Judge.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In 1985 the marriage of defendants Harvey Rubin and Carol Rubin was dissolved by judgment entered by the Superior Court for the Judicial District of Danbury, Connecticut. Custody of their only child, Rebecca, was granted to Carol Rubin, with liberal visitation rights to Harvey Rubin. Following the divorce...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases