DARLING v. STANDARD ALASKA PRODUCTION

No. S-3777.

818 P.2d 677 (1991)

Robert DARLING, d/b/a Darling Enterprises, Appellant, v. STANDARD ALASKA PRODUCTION COMPANY, Exxon Corporation, Union Oil Company of California, Amoco Production Company, Cook Inlet Region, Inc., Nana Regional Corporation, Inc., Doyon Limited and Arco Alaska, Inc., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

October 17, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Sandberg and Henry J. Camarot, Sandberg & Smith, Anchorage, for appellant.

John M. Conway and Craig F. Stowers, Atkinson, Conway & Gagnon, Anchorage, for appellees.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.


OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

Robert Darling filed suit against the owners and operators of the Endicott Island production facility, claiming they had appropriated cinder blocks of his design in protecting against shore erosion. The superior court held that Darling's claim was preempted by federal patent law, and granted summary judgment against Darling. We affirm.

I

Endicott Island is a forty-five acre artificial island, located in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases