PER CURIAM.
Assuming that the trial court's statement could be deemed to have been an impermissible comment on the credibility of the fingerprint technician, and assuming the point was preserved for appellate review, any error was harmless. State v. DiGuilio,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.