PER CURIAM.
Appellants challenge the lower court's entry of summary final judgment in favor of appellee. They contend that their amended complaint relates back, in that appellee suffered no prejudice when substituted for "John Doe Inc." as a party. We find the statute of limitations argument, relied upon by appellee below and on appeal was previously raised before a different judge in the same case and court and in a previous appeal to this court.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
