VANSLYKE v. FRED MEYER, INC.

WCB 89-24556; CA A67929.

816 P.2d 664 (1991)

108 Or.App. 493

In the matter of the Compensation of Albert W. VANSLYKE, Claimant. Albert W. Vanslyke, Petitioner — Cross-Respondent, v. FRED MEYER, INC., Respondent — Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 21, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles D. Maier and Gatti, Gatti, Maier & Associates, Salem, filed the brief for petitioner — cross-respondent.

Jerald Keene, Portland, argued the cause for respondent — cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Roberts, Reinisch, MacKenzie, Healey & Wilson, Portland.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that affirmed the referee's order holding that the Hearings Division lacked jurisdiction to correct an alleged error in a final and unappealed Board order concerning claimant's entitlement to attorney fees. Employer cross-petitions for review, contending that the Board erred in refusing to provide, without charge, a transcript of the closing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases