FLISOCK v. STATE, DIV. OF RET. AND BEN.

No. S-3725.

818 P.2d 640 (1991)

Peter E. FLISOCK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Alaska, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

October 4, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan R. Sharrock and Richard W. Maki, Hellen, Partnow & Condon, Anchorage, for appellant.

Virginia B. Ragle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Juneau and Douglas B. Baily, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.


OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Peter E. Flisock seeks a higher monthly retirement benefit under the Teachers' Retirement System (TRS) than he is now receiving. Flisock argues that the average base salary used in calculating his retirement benefits should include the lump-sum payment he received for unused leave he accrued over six years. The Division of Retirement Benefits (division) did not include the unused leave payment. The Teachers' Retirement Board (board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases