1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 780 F.Supp.
  5. 780 F.Supp. 672 (1991)
 

GOLIGHTLY v. YEUTTER

No. CIV 90-1272 PHX RCB.

780 F.Supp. 672 (1991)

Dolores GOLIGHTLY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Clayton YEUTTER, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

September 3, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack E. Brown, Hal Michael Clyde, Brown & Bain PA, Phoenix, Ariz., Alan R. Malasky, Robin Rowland, Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Michael R. Arkfeld, U.S. Atty.'s Office, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants.

AMENDED ORDER

BROOMFIELD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move for summary judgment declaring the plaintiffs separate "persons" for purposes of the Payment Limitation Regulations, 7 C.F.R. § 795, applicable to Price Support Production and Adjustment programs promulgated under the Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 1421 et seq. Defendant responded to the motion and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment affirming the administrative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases