AHRENS, Judge.
In this action for costs, appellants, J. Cecil Fisher, Billy Fisher, Lena Fisher and Sue Fisher allege the trial court erred in sustaining respondents' application for execution for costs filed pursuant to Rule 76.01 and § 514.170 RSMo 1986.
Appellants raise five points of error. First, the trial court erred in denying their motion to quash respondents' application for execution, because respondent Spray Planes, Inc. had forfeited its corporate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.