LATHAM v. HANEY SEED CO.

No. 18835.

807 P.2d 630 (1991)

119 Idaho 412

James W. LATHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HANEY SEED COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, November 1990 Term.

February 21, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Webb, Burton, Carlson, Pedersen & Webb, Twin Falls, for plaintiff-appellant. Lloyd J. Webb, argued.

Holland & Hart, Langroise, Sullivan, Boise, for defendant-respondent. Debra K. Ellers, argued.


JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an employment benefits case. The only issue presented is whether the two-year statute of limitations contained in I.C. § 45-608 or the five-year statute of limitations contained in I.C. § 5-216 is applicable. We hold that the two-year statute is applicable and affirm the summary judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint. In doing so, we distinguish Whitlock v. Haney Seed Co...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases