1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 775 F.Supp.
  5. 775 F.Supp. 658 (1991)
 

HEDMAN, GIBSON, COSTIGAN & HOARE, P.C. v. SULLIVAN

No. 91-CIV-1058 (LJF).

775 F.Supp. 658 (1991)

HEDMAN, GIBSON, COSTIGAN & HOARE, P.C., Plaintiff, v. SULLIVAN, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 10, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth F. Florek, New York City, for plaintiff.

Robert M. Kaplan, New York City, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

FREEH, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff Hedman, Gibson, Costigan & Hoare, P.C. ("Hedman") seeks to recover unpaid legal fees from William Sullivan, Sr. ("Sullivan"), one of three guarantors for the fee obligations of Hedman's client, Rates Technology Inc. ("RTI"). The day after this action was filed, RTI sued Hedman and one of its name partners, Thomas Gibson, in New York state court, alleging that Hedman breached a written...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases