1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 773 F.Supp.
  5. 773 F.Supp. 641 (1991)
 

KEY BANK, N.A. v. SANDERSON

Nos. 89 Civ. 3826 (RWS), 89 Civ. 3827 (RWS), 89 Civ. 3923 (RWS) and 89 Civ. 3926 (RWS).

773 F.Supp. 641 (1991)

KEY BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. Scott D. SANDERSON, et al., Defendants. KEY BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. Rik Albert BLYLEVEN, et al., Defendants. KEY BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. Daniel PETRY, et al., Defendants. KEY BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. Robert W. MOSS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 18, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hiscock & Barclay, Albany, N.Y. (T. Paul Kane, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Beigel & Sandler, Ltd., New York City (Karl J. Stoecker, of counsel), for defendants.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Key Bank N.A. ("the Bank") has moved under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. for summary judgment granting the relief sought in its complaint against the four individual defendants ("the Defendants"), the makers of certain promissory notes assigned to the Bank ("The Notes"). For the reasons set forth below the motion is denied.

Prior Proceedings

These actions to recover on the Notes were commenced in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases